Dyno comparison: 9:1 comp vs 10:1
Moderators: Andrea, boosted hybrid, et Phil
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Dyno comparison: 9:1 comp vs 10:1
I had an opportunity to measure the difference between 10:1 compression set-up, and than dropped to 9:1 compression. The previous engine was a stock OEM gsr bottom end. The bottom end was swapped out with a 9:1 CP pistons/Eagle rod 0.020" gsr bottom end.
The set-up was as follows:
Inline pro manifold
Gt28rs
2.5" downpipe, 2.5" exhaust with an itr muffler (def. a restriction)
Tial 38mm wastegate (9psi wastegate spring)
Spearco intercooler
Drag IC piping
RC 550cc injectors
Walboro 255lph HP pump
3bar map sensor
Neptune Tuned
What was changed:
Bottom end
9:1 CP pistons, eagle rods, ACL bearings
No boost controller, the pulls were done on a 9psi Tial wastegate spring.
Here are the results:

To show that there was no difference in boost pressures, here is the boost pressure plot:

This is probably the most accurate test that you can perform. NO other changes were made to the system. What was interesting between the two tunes is that it took 6-7 degrees more timing than the previous 10:1 compression tune everywhere in boost to get to MBTT (maximum brake torque timing).
The set-up was as follows:
Inline pro manifold
Gt28rs
2.5" downpipe, 2.5" exhaust with an itr muffler (def. a restriction)
Tial 38mm wastegate (9psi wastegate spring)
Spearco intercooler
Drag IC piping
RC 550cc injectors
Walboro 255lph HP pump
3bar map sensor
Neptune Tuned
What was changed:
Bottom end
9:1 CP pistons, eagle rods, ACL bearings
No boost controller, the pulls were done on a 9psi Tial wastegate spring.
Here are the results:

To show that there was no difference in boost pressures, here is the boost pressure plot:

This is probably the most accurate test that you can perform. NO other changes were made to the system. What was interesting between the two tunes is that it took 6-7 degrees more timing than the previous 10:1 compression tune everywhere in boost to get to MBTT (maximum brake torque timing).
-

boosted hybrid - Tuner
- Posts: 4354
- Joined: December 15th, 2003, 2:18 am
- Location: Easton, Pa
Cyphear wrote:Good work! So 15whp loss for a 1 "drop" in CR.
Whats interesting is the low end power is almost the exact same. So maybe another 1.5psi would have made the 9:1 and 10:1 curves the exact same.
so much for saying you lose your low end with dropped compression huh?
- LostSolVTEC
- Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 199
- Joined: April 21st, 2004, 1:54 pm
- Location: Pa
Sweet...
Am I reading the pressure plot wrong though or is one run at 9psi and the other at 11psi? If so isn't the old 10whp for evry 1psi general rules taking place here?
Either way pretty sweet test... I wonder what the results would be like on all motor alone.
Am I reading the pressure plot wrong though or is one run at 9psi and the other at 11psi? If so isn't the old 10whp for evry 1psi general rules taking place here?
Either way pretty sweet test... I wonder what the results would be like on all motor alone.
- Alstare
- Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 28
- Joined: June 14th, 2004, 8:44 pm
One pressure plot is like 0.25~0.5psi higher than the other. They are at approximately 8.5~9psi. With wastegates running off of just a spring, and no boost controller i ofter see 0.5~1psi fluctuations in the boost pressure from the wastegate getting hot.
-

boosted hybrid - Tuner
- Posts: 4354
- Joined: December 15th, 2003, 2:18 am
- Location: Easton, Pa
still, all we have here is proof that raised compression doesn't necessarily have a big impact on the lower end as previously though. now, i could see where a setup running 11:1 would have more lower end than 9:1. but still......not too chabby. 
-

armed ferret - Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 143
- Joined: November 1st, 2004, 5:56 pm
- Location: Offutt Air Force Base
One thing to remember is that the turbo that is being used is a gt28rs, and its a log manifold. The log manifold will have a higher exhaust pressure in the manifold, as well as needing less exhaust energy to spin the smaller turbine wheel in the gt28rs.
-

boosted hybrid - Tuner
- Posts: 4354
- Joined: December 15th, 2003, 2:18 am
- Location: Easton, Pa
6-7 degrees, wow
http://www.ubrf.org - WNY's Premeire Automotive Forum
Reppin EG Team Teal Powa 11.95 @ 118.5 in 03 STOCK LS Longblock pos maxrev kit
Reppin EG Team Teal Powa 11.95 @ 118.5 in 03 STOCK LS Longblock pos maxrev kit
- Toda Party
- Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 100
- Joined: July 12th, 2004, 10:16 pm
Itr muffler
lol why he still have a itr muffler, lol sorry if i laugh its just because even when i was stock itr b18c5 i have just changed my muffler for a straight one i feel the difference imagine on this turbo i deff loss a lots of whp
- Isratyper
- Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 22nd, 2004, 11:47 am
- Location: Canada,Québec
About 20-25whp worth of power loss pretty much everywhere, with slower spool. We dropped the muffler and found out how restrictive. I can say that its the quiestest turbo car i have ever driven in and tuned.
-

boosted hybrid - Tuner
- Posts: 4354
- Joined: December 15th, 2003, 2:18 am
- Location: Easton, Pa
word man, i'd rather take 20 less hp vs 20 more tickets every month for loud exhaust by ze coppers
http://www.ubrf.org - WNY's Premeire Automotive Forum
Reppin EG Team Teal Powa 11.95 @ 118.5 in 03 STOCK LS Longblock pos maxrev kit
Reppin EG Team Teal Powa 11.95 @ 118.5 in 03 STOCK LS Longblock pos maxrev kit
- Toda Party
- Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 100
- Joined: July 12th, 2004, 10:16 pm
Nice test 
STHPERFORMANCE
Top Quality Parts At A Affordable Price!
We Now Offer Jet-Coating, PM US For Details!!
Email:sales@sthperformance.com
Top Quality Parts At A Affordable Price!
We Now Offer Jet-Coating, PM US For Details!!
Email:sales@sthperformance.com
- STHPERFORMANCE
- Trial User
- Posts: 5
- Joined: December 22nd, 2003, 2:09 pm
- Location: Central,Pa
Nice comparison. Wouldn't it be true though that if more boost was run and more peak power made, the power difference between 9:1 and 10:1 compression ratios would increase?
Also I thought that MBT was mean brake torque, not maximum brake torque.
Also I thought that MBT was mean brake torque, not maximum brake torque.
-
RyanCivic2000 - Evans Tuning Member
- Posts: 31
- Joined: February 4th, 2004, 2:22 pm
- Location: Tampa, FL
Wouldn't it be true though that if more boost was run and more peak power made, the power difference between 9:1 and 10:1 compression ratios would increase?
Also I thought that MBT was mean brake torque, not maximum brake torque.
It will be more of a difference, but it wont rise linearly or expotentially. Unfortunately i wont be able to measure that difference on this particular set-up.
Mean indicates average. The MBTT is the point at which there is maximum or peak torque occurs.
-

boosted hybrid - Tuner
- Posts: 4354
- Joined: December 15th, 2003, 2:18 am
- Location: Easton, Pa
Bringing this back from the dead.
Jeff, were both of these fully tuned/retuned?
Jeff, were both of these fully tuned/retuned?
- Induction Performance (AWD Dynojet 424X)
- Tampa, FL 33624
- Tuning: 727.505.1423
* AEM EMS, Electromotive Tec-3, Hondata, Neptune Tuning & More
- Tampa, FL 33624
- Tuning: 727.505.1423
* AEM EMS, Electromotive Tec-3, Hondata, Neptune Tuning & More
- alpha
- Moderator
- Posts: 650
- Joined: March 1st, 2004, 9:55 pm
- Location: Florida
27 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


